Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Judging Vs. Judgmental (With Props to Ben)

When judging, it's important to not be judgmental.  In other words, when making an important decision that requires true objectivity - be that at work, or life - we have to ensure that our ultimate decision is not based on ours, or others, "pre-filtered" individual opinions.  That's being (problematically) judgmental.   

Think about it: how can we truly expect to get the best-of-the-best decision, if/when our individual biases (especially the superficial ones) get in the way. We can't.  Now, try as we might to not be judgmental - and moreover, judge with objectivity - that's easier said than done. That's why, when it comes to quality decision making, it's absolutely imperative that we screen our assumptions/presumptions/conclusions  through the right system - like the Ben Franklin system, for instance.  That one always works: it's easy, quick and effective. 

What's that!?  Never heard of the Ben Franklin "scales of justice" system?  Well then, let's give it a go.  Simply draw a horizontal line down the middle of a piece of paper, and another vertical towards the top of the page (so that it looks like a scale).  On the top of the left side write "Pros," and on the top right side write "Cons."  Then when ready, jot down your lists.  When done, go with which side has the most, just like an objective scale would do (assuming you didn't cheat; Ben don't like cheaters).    

By leveraging Ben Franklin's simple system to help us objectively judge our big decisions ... and using the best and most accurate information available ... it stands to reason that this little extra step will help us overcome those obscured judge-mentalists tendencies.  And maybe, avoid some big issues down the road. 

At least we hope, right.

Objective Judging is Good.