Sometimes, we find ourselves having to choose between what we hope makes the most sense, with what's best (or better), for the proverbial "bottom line." Sure, we've all been there/done that: at work, and life.
We've also seen how the results of these choices, can tend to favor one, over the other. It's as if sometimes the options are diametrically opposed. And why? Why do we have to have conflict - either perceived, or real - when it comes to choosing dollars over sense?
Maybe it's a DNA thing.
While we might not be able to fix the root cause (genetics are hard to rewire), what if we agree on a proactive remedy. And what's that, you ask? Well, simple: don't let it get there in the first place.
In other words, when it comes to making decisions that will be judged based on dollars over sense, or sense over dollars - just insist that the decision be accordingly aligned, taking both into equal consideration through balanced judgement, and healthy compromise. Think and/with ... not either/or.
If we start with the end goal in mind, we can get the balance and harmony we're looking for.
Dollars And Sense Are Good.
Friday, October 29, 2010
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Book Smarts or Street Smarts (Why Not Both!?)
If I had a nickle for every time I've heard someone rationalize that their keen sense of knowing and intelligence comes from being "street smart" (versus book smart, I assume) - well, I'd have me enough money to buy a triple grande, no whip, mocha chip cappuccino (although, I don't think my choice of morning beverage does much for my street creed).
In other words, if you correlate my fufu/fiffy drink to the expense-side math, there's lots of folks who have boasted to me about their S over B factor. And why? Is one really better than the other? Or cooler? Or edgier? Or whateverer? And why does one have to be over the other? Like it's superior? Or better? Or whateverer. That's why I call BS, to the SB.
The reality is: both are good. In unison. Partnership. Matrimony. BUT, if you actually have to put one ahead of the other, well then, it's simple: books smarts trump street smarts. After all, books are an incredibly cost-effective, safe and efficient way to learn, and learn lots. And they don't come with all the concerns that come from the street.
So, for all those hipsters that thinks it's hipper to be street than books - think again. Because at the end of the day, our goal is wisdom. And wisdom comes from paying attention to all sources. Especially books. So if asked, tell 'em you're book smart AND street smart. Better yet, don't tell them anything; be book smart and street smart without the fanfare, and let your wisdom from both, show through in how you work, live and achieve. To play off/on the pedestrian cliche: walk the talk; don't talk the walk.
Smarts Are Good (Wherever They Come From)
In other words, if you correlate my fufu/fiffy drink to the expense-side math, there's lots of folks who have boasted to me about their S over B factor. And why? Is one really better than the other? Or cooler? Or edgier? Or whateverer? And why does one have to be over the other? Like it's superior? Or better? Or whateverer. That's why I call BS, to the SB.
The reality is: both are good. In unison. Partnership. Matrimony. BUT, if you actually have to put one ahead of the other, well then, it's simple: books smarts trump street smarts. After all, books are an incredibly cost-effective, safe and efficient way to learn, and learn lots. And they don't come with all the concerns that come from the street.
So, for all those hipsters that thinks it's hipper to be street than books - think again. Because at the end of the day, our goal is wisdom. And wisdom comes from paying attention to all sources. Especially books. So if asked, tell 'em you're book smart AND street smart. Better yet, don't tell them anything; be book smart and street smart without the fanfare, and let your wisdom from both, show through in how you work, live and achieve. To play off/on the pedestrian cliche: walk the talk; don't talk the walk.
Smarts Are Good (Wherever They Come From)
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Work In The Name of Love
We've all heard the wishful sentiment uttered by well-intentioned thinkers: "Do what you love, and love what you do." While that's a great suggestion, and for sure would be nice - the reality is, that's probably going to be a stretch, for the most of us.
For the most of us, it's more like "Do what you can, and accept what you do." Because after all, a job and its pay checks are more often than not, the biggest priority. More to the point, it's hard to love anything, let alone live - if we don't make money.
Now, before we think work's gotta be all dreary and sad and oh-woe-is-me even if the job isn't what we love, let alone ideal ... think again. It can be. Especially if we have the right perspective, attitude and gratitude. Sure, it can be hard to whistle while we work. And no doubt, some jobs just aren't fun. But throughout it all, remember that from our work, we get paid. And with our pay, we are able to provide for ourselves and our family. And family, is where love calls home.
So maybe the saying does work, if you think about: We can love what we do, and do what we love - assuming love "in the name of" is the reason - and the by product - of what we do. Get it?
Working In The Name Of Love Is Good.
For the most of us, it's more like "Do what you can, and accept what you do." Because after all, a job and its pay checks are more often than not, the biggest priority. More to the point, it's hard to love anything, let alone live - if we don't make money.
Now, before we think work's gotta be all dreary and sad and oh-woe-is-me even if the job isn't what we love, let alone ideal ... think again. It can be. Especially if we have the right perspective, attitude and gratitude. Sure, it can be hard to whistle while we work. And no doubt, some jobs just aren't fun. But throughout it all, remember that from our work, we get paid. And with our pay, we are able to provide for ourselves and our family. And family, is where love calls home.
So maybe the saying does work, if you think about: We can love what we do, and do what we love - assuming love "in the name of" is the reason - and the by product - of what we do. Get it?
Working In The Name Of Love Is Good.
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Trust But Verify
In the workplace, there's often uncertainty and even anxiety, with regard to how someone should ask someone else about an assignment they are working on. Or more specifically, when that assignment will be completed (assuming they haven't been told).
The thing is, most people are extremely sensitive to seeming rude or worse yet - mistrustful - if they ask their colleague, let alone a boss, about the status of their work. Even if it impacts their own work. After all, they don't want to imply that that person isn't working, or won't get it done. They just want to know what's going on, and when things will get done. Sounds fair enough, right? But it causes anxiety, on both sides of the equation.
So what's the remedy. Well, embrace a simple yet powerful agreement/philosophy: Trust But Verify.
If everyone in the office works under the Trust But Verify mantra, than everyone is covered: The person doing the work in question knows they are trusted from the get-go, but that they also need to let those that matter, and those that might ask, know when the assignment will get done. And the ones doing the asking get absolved from seeming mistrustful, because the policy clearly states that trust is the foundation to the relationship. So if they have to ask, for whatever reason - don't take it personally.
To be clear though, this Trust But Verify mantra only works if both sides live up to their end of the deal.
Not only does it work, it's the foundation for great teamwork. Try it.
Trust But Verify Is Good.
The thing is, most people are extremely sensitive to seeming rude or worse yet - mistrustful - if they ask their colleague, let alone a boss, about the status of their work. Even if it impacts their own work. After all, they don't want to imply that that person isn't working, or won't get it done. They just want to know what's going on, and when things will get done. Sounds fair enough, right? But it causes anxiety, on both sides of the equation.
So what's the remedy. Well, embrace a simple yet powerful agreement/philosophy: Trust But Verify.
If everyone in the office works under the Trust But Verify mantra, than everyone is covered: The person doing the work in question knows they are trusted from the get-go, but that they also need to let those that matter, and those that might ask, know when the assignment will get done. And the ones doing the asking get absolved from seeming mistrustful, because the policy clearly states that trust is the foundation to the relationship. So if they have to ask, for whatever reason - don't take it personally.
To be clear though, this Trust But Verify mantra only works if both sides live up to their end of the deal.
Not only does it work, it's the foundation for great teamwork. Try it.
Trust But Verify Is Good.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
I Don't Know (But I'm Ready To Learn)
The other day, I was in a meeting with a bunch of know-it-alls. They we're talking over each other about a bunch of stuff. Everyone had something to say (and then some). Not surprisingly, everyone also seemed to have an answer; let alone the right answer. I'm pretty sure I never heard the words "I don't know."
And that's a shame.
You see - it's okay to not always have the answers. After all, we don't know what we don't know. While it might seem uncomfortable at times, it's actually commendable to admit that we don't have the knowledge or understanding that others have. It doesn't mean we're stupid; it just means we're not there - yet.
By admitting our inquisitive uncertainty, we're being honest and humble - which are admirable traits, especially when hanging out with know-it-alls. By announcing "I don't know" - we actually get a more intelligent conversation going, which can lead to a more intelligent outcome. From confusion, comes clarity. But we can't get to the clarity, before admitting the unknown.
Sure, it can be unsettling - let alone scary or embarrassing - to admit that we don't know something (especially if we, or others, think we should). But as a friend of mine once said when rationalizing the upside versus downside of the IDK mantra: "I'd rather put up with a momentary perception of stupidity, than being a fool for life, just because I didn't want to admit that I didn't know something, and take the time to learn." Great advise.
I Don't Know (But I'm Ready To Learn) is Good
And that's a shame.
You see - it's okay to not always have the answers. After all, we don't know what we don't know. While it might seem uncomfortable at times, it's actually commendable to admit that we don't have the knowledge or understanding that others have. It doesn't mean we're stupid; it just means we're not there - yet.
By admitting our inquisitive uncertainty, we're being honest and humble - which are admirable traits, especially when hanging out with know-it-alls. By announcing "I don't know" - we actually get a more intelligent conversation going, which can lead to a more intelligent outcome. From confusion, comes clarity. But we can't get to the clarity, before admitting the unknown.
Sure, it can be unsettling - let alone scary or embarrassing - to admit that we don't know something (especially if we, or others, think we should). But as a friend of mine once said when rationalizing the upside versus downside of the IDK mantra: "I'd rather put up with a momentary perception of stupidity, than being a fool for life, just because I didn't want to admit that I didn't know something, and take the time to learn." Great advise.
I Don't Know (But I'm Ready To Learn) is Good
Friday, September 24, 2010
Be Quick - But Don't Hurry
We've all heard the expression "speed kills." And while that particular phrase was likely coined with regard to cars, or boats, or skiing, or any physical activity whose rapid momentum can cause (gulp) death - it also applies to business, and life. At least the sentiment, that is.
And why? Because speed, in and of itself, can be bad. Although we might like speedy service, or speedy success, or speedy whatever - the fact is that speed, for the sake of speed, can cause problems. More often than not, speed can make for mistakes. It can lead to poor quality, failure and a host of unfortunate by-products.
When we speed, we hurry. And when we hurry, we can mess up. Which makes the word hurry, like the word speed, subject to negative interpretations. Put another way, if we over do speed and we hurry - which leads to subsequent, but avoidable, mistakes - than we might mess up our job, which can kill our career. (See how that works?) At the very least, it can get us hurt, which impacts our ability to succeed.
While it can be good to go fast, be quick and have a sense of urgency - we never want speed, or the hurry factor, to get in the way of a job well done. Best case scenario, think fast AND accurate; it's a both/and - not an either/or.
Fast AND Accurate Is Good.
And why? Because speed, in and of itself, can be bad. Although we might like speedy service, or speedy success, or speedy whatever - the fact is that speed, for the sake of speed, can cause problems. More often than not, speed can make for mistakes. It can lead to poor quality, failure and a host of unfortunate by-products.
When we speed, we hurry. And when we hurry, we can mess up. Which makes the word hurry, like the word speed, subject to negative interpretations. Put another way, if we over do speed and we hurry - which leads to subsequent, but avoidable, mistakes - than we might mess up our job, which can kill our career. (See how that works?) At the very least, it can get us hurt, which impacts our ability to succeed.
While it can be good to go fast, be quick and have a sense of urgency - we never want speed, or the hurry factor, to get in the way of a job well done. Best case scenario, think fast AND accurate; it's a both/and - not an either/or.
Fast AND Accurate Is Good.
Monday, September 20, 2010
Be Professional
Watched the premiere episode of The Apprentice. Once again, was appalled by some of the contestants' pathetic lack of manners. Seriously, where do they get some of these people from, and why them? (I think we know the answer, as it is sur-reality TV after all; but let's let this one play out for a while.)
If it's to to make business people look like idiots; or make us cringe to think that this is acceptable common-place "board-room" behavior; or imply that the office environment is wrought with arrogant superficiality, petty cat-fighting, divisive name-calling, cowardly back-stabbing, with the occasional off-handed compliment - then they are doing a good (but unfortunate) job.
Sure, bad behavior happens at work. But that's not the norm.
That said, to anyone in corporate America, especially young new employees, who thinks the ugly sensationalized behavior overly displayed on The Apprentice is okay, let alone tolerated in most companies - think again. It's not. That show should have both a viewer discretion AND a warning label like they put on unhealthy products. That label should read: "Made for TV only. Don't try this at work. (Unless you do actually want to be fired.)"
If I could give those TV contestants - as well as those real-life contestants that need it - one easy-to-live-by-easy-to-remember piece of advice, it would be this: Be Professional. Please.
Being Professional is Good.
If it's to to make business people look like idiots; or make us cringe to think that this is acceptable common-place "board-room" behavior; or imply that the office environment is wrought with arrogant superficiality, petty cat-fighting, divisive name-calling, cowardly back-stabbing, with the occasional off-handed compliment - then they are doing a good (but unfortunate) job.
Sure, bad behavior happens at work. But that's not the norm.
That said, to anyone in corporate America, especially young new employees, who thinks the ugly sensationalized behavior overly displayed on The Apprentice is okay, let alone tolerated in most companies - think again. It's not. That show should have both a viewer discretion AND a warning label like they put on unhealthy products. That label should read: "Made for TV only. Don't try this at work. (Unless you do actually want to be fired.)"
If I could give those TV contestants - as well as those real-life contestants that need it - one easy-to-live-by-easy-to-remember piece of advice, it would be this: Be Professional. Please.
Being Professional is Good.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






